The FBI searched Fulton County’s Election Hub in Union City and seized ballots, ballot images and voter rolls tied to the 2020 race, prompting renewed debate over whether the action is about integrity or politics. The piece argues that the 2020 election was certified, audited and upheld by bipartisan officials, and warns against repeatedly relitigating settled results. Lawmakers on both sides have reacted, with some calling the operation politically motivated and others pointing to ongoing legal inquiries.
FBI Raid On Fulton County Election Hub Rekindles 2020 Dispute — Time To Move On
Opinion - FBI raids Fulton County election center over 2020 race — move on!
The FBI's search of the Fulton County Election Hub in Union City has reignited debate over the 2020 presidential contest. Agents executed a court-authorized seizure of physical ballots, ballot images and voter rolls tied to the 2020 race — an action that many critics say reflects an ongoing refusal to accept settled results rather than a narrow election-integrity inquiry.
What Happened
Federal agents served a court order at the Fulton County facility, collecting materials related to the 2020 election. The site has long been targeted by election-denial narratives and was part of the broader Georgia investigation tied to former President Donald Trump that later faced legal setbacks.
Why This Matters
The 2020 election was certified by the states, accepted by Congress, and resulted in the inauguration of President Joe Biden in January 2021. Bipartisan election officials — including Republicans and some who served during the prior administration — repeatedly affirmed the election’s security. While isolated incidents of fraud occurred, they did not change the outcome, and multiple audits and reviews have not produced evidence of widespread fraud.
Context And Reactions
The raid follows a December Department of Justice complaint concerning Fulton County’s handling of certain 2020 election records and comes amid other high-profile federal inquiries that critics view as politically charged. Some lawmakers and commentators described the action as part of a pattern of efforts to revisit a decided election.
Sen. Jon Ossoff said the raid looks like a continuation of attempts to overturn the 2020 result after repeated audits confirmed the outcome. Sen. Raphael Warnock described the FBI’s priorities as better focused on violent crime than political disputes.
Sen. Mark Warner questioned the presence at the scene of Tulsi Gabbard, a prominent Trump ally, noting that her appearance raised questions about the optics and motivations around the operation. Reports and public statements have also highlighted the Jan. 2, 2021, call in which former President Trump pressured Georgia officials to "find" the precise number of votes needed to change the state’s result — an episode that shaped later investigations and public scrutiny.
Bottom Line
Whether the FBI’s action is legally justified or politically fraught will be debated in courts and in public forums. But the central argument of this column is straightforward: a democratic society cannot continuously relitigate an election that has been certified, audited and upheld by bipartisan officials. Political disappointment is not the same as proof of systemic fraud, and repeatedly reopening settled contests risks eroding public trust in institutions.
Author: Lindsey Granger is a NewsNation contributor and co-host of The Hill’s commentary show “Rising.” This column is an edited transcription of her on-air commentary.
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, visit The Hill.
Help us improve.
