This report documents the earliest clear evidence of cremation in Africa: a 9,500-year-old adult pyre at Hora 1 rock shelter in northern Malawi. Forensic and microscopic analyses indicate a single small adult—likely a woman about 1.5 m tall—was cremated at temperatures of at least 1,000°F (540°C); cut marks show deliberate flesh removal with stone tools. The pyre required an estimated 30 kg of wood, involved multiple participants, and occupied a location used for repeated fires from roughly 10,240 years ago onward, signaling a long-lived ritual significance.
9,500-Year-Old Pyre in Malawi Reveals Unexpected Stone Age Cremation Ritual

Nearly 10,000 years ago, beneath a natural rock overhang at the Hora 1 site in northern Malawi, people tended a ferocious fire that left a dramatic archaeological trace. Our multidisciplinary team of bioarchaeologists, archaeologists and forensic anthropologists has documented the earliest clear evidence of cremation in Africa and the oldest known adult pyre cremation worldwide.
Discovery and Context
Excavation revealed a compacted ash deposit roughly the size of a queen bed beneath the shelter. Radiocarbon dating places the cremation at about 9,500 years ago, with earlier and later fires at the same location beginning around 10,240 years ago. The deposit contains clustered, calcined bone fragments and microscopic ash layers that preserve a sequence of burning events, indicating long-term significance of the spot.
Who Was Cremated?
Forensic and bioarchaeological analyses show all human fragments come from a single small adult, probably a woman about 1.5 meters (5 feet) tall. Skeletal markers indicate a physically active life, a partially healed bone infection in an arm, and early arthritis consistent with a middle-aged adult.
How the Cremation Was Carried Out
Burning patterns—warping, cracking and discoloration—indicate the body burned with some soft tissue present at temperatures of at least 1,000°F (540°C). Microscopic cut marks at muscle attachment sites and along the arms show attendants used stone tools to remove flesh and aid combustion. Numerous small, pointed stone flakes were found inside the ash, suggesting tools were added to the fire as it burned. Ash microfossils and soil traces imply at least ~30 kg (about 70 lb) of deadwood was collected and tended for hours or days.
Ritual Significance and Unusual Features
The arrangement of remains and the scale of fuel and labor argue against cannibalism and for a community-scale mortuary ritual. Notably, skull bones and teeth—elements that often survive cremation—are absent, suggesting the head may have been removed before or during the ritual, although this cannot be confirmed absolutely. Additional displaced and differently colored fragments from later excavation seasons indicate the body was handled and moved during the burning.
Implications for Hunter-Gatherer Societies
This find challenges assumptions that elaborate, place-tied mortuary rituals are restricted to food-producing societies. At Hora 1 other burials dating back to 16,000 years ago show simple interment practices for men, women and children from a long-term local population. The exceptional pyre event indicates differential treatment of the dead and suggests more complex social roles or beliefs within this hunter-gatherer community.
Methods
Conclusions rely on a combination of microscopic ash analysis, radiocarbon dating, forensic anthropology, and bioarchaeological study of bone morphology and cut-mark patterns. These complementary approaches allowed the team to reconstruct both the biological profile of the individual and the technical and social dimensions of the cremation event.
Conclusion: The Hora 1 pyre documents a large, labor-intensive mortuary spectacle among Stone Age foragers in south-central Africa—one that was remembered and ritually revisited for centuries.
This article summarizes findings originally reported in Science Advances by Jessica C. Thompson (Yale University), Elizabeth Sawchuk (Stony Brook University), Jessica Cerezo-Román (University of Oklahoma), and colleagues. Funding disclosure and author affiliations are detailed in the original paper.
Help us improve.


































