On Sept. 18 in Indiantown, Florida, a father produced a concealed handgun at a school bus stop after two teenagers approached him following a pizza-related dispute the day before. Martin County investigators interviewed witnesses and concluded the father acted in lawful self-defense; no arrests were made and the father declined to press charges. Florida Statute 790.115 restricts firearms at bus stops but contains a self-defense exception, leaving an unresolved statutory distinction that was not tested in court. The father, a security guard, has since withdrawn his son from public school and plans to homeschool him.
Florida Father Draws Handgun At School Bus Stop After Pizza Dispute; Sheriff Says He Acted Lawfully
Image Credit: WPBF / YouTube.
On Sept. 18 in Indiantown, Florida, a confrontation at a school bus stop ended when a father produced a concealed handgun after two teenagers approached him following a pizza-related dispute the day before. No one was shot and no arrests were made.
What Happened
According to the Martin County Sheriff’s Office, the incident began Sept. 17 aboard a school bus when a 16-year-old student carrying pizza was repeatedly asked for a slice by a 14-year-old. Sheriff John Budensiek said the younger teen became threatening and allegedly struck the older student in the head.
The older student told his father, who later spoke with the bus driver about the problem. The next morning, the father drove his son to the same stop. The 14-year-old reportedly got off the bus and confronted the father while other students began calling people and shouting. A second 16-year-old, who had been suspended from school, arrived after a phone call and joined the confrontation.
Sheriff investigators say both teens closed the distance on the father despite his repeated commands to stay back. The father placed his son behind him, drew a concealed handgun, and ordered the teens to back away. Video from the scene shows the teenagers retreating with their hands raised. The father then put the firearm away, drove to flag down a deputy, and immediately reported the encounter.
Statements From Those Involved
Sheriff Budensiek described the man as the victim of the confrontation and said investigators received consistent witness accounts of the critical sequence. The father declined to pursue charges against the teenagers; Budensiek said the office would have sought warrants had the father wished to press charges.
One teenager, RJ McIntyre, told local television he initially offered a dollar for a slice of pizza and acknowledged he should have stopped after being turned down, saying, 'I take accountability.' McIntyre and the older student said they dropped their backpacks and were preparing to fight the morning of Sept. 18.
Another young man, Trevor Ivory, said he arrived after a call from his younger brother, spoke briefly with the father and later urged the father to let the teens fight. Ivory said the father then placed his son behind him and drew a gun; both teens said they were frightened when they saw the weapon.
Legal Context
Florida Statute 790.115 specifically addresses firearms at school bus stops. One provision makes it a felony to exhibit a firearm at a bus stop in a threatening manner when the act is not in lawful self-defense. Another provision separately restricts possession of firearms at bus stops and treats violations by otherwise-authorized concealed carriers as misdemeanors.
Florida’s broader self-defense law states that a person threatened with deadly force has no duty to retreat when they reasonably believe using force is necessary to prevent imminent death, great bodily harm, or a forcible felony, provided they are not engaged in criminal activity and are in a place they have a right to be.
The sheriff’s office concluded the father’s conduct was justified under these statutes and filed no charges. Because the father declined to press charges and no prosecutor pursued the matter, the statutory tension between the bus-stop possession rules and lawful self-defense was not litigated in court.
Aftermath
Investigators noted the father worked as a security guard, was wearing a badge, and had been carrying the handgun concealed before the confrontation. The sheriff criticized a short clip of the encounter that circulated online for omitting the events that preceded the moment the gun was drawn. The teenagers maintain they were not attacking the father and argue that a firearm should not have been displayed around children waiting for school. The father has withdrawn his 16-year-old son from the public school and plans to homeschool him.
Neither teen was arrested; no shots were fired; investigators concluded the father acted lawfully, and he declined to pursue charges.
Help us improve.
