The White House says President Trump will not reimburse roughly $10 million already spent on campaign-style ads produced with DHS funds, even as he vows to "pay for them myself" for future spots. The administration defends the videos as "presidential public service announcements," while critics and legal experts call them illegal partisan propaganda. Lawmakers including Sen. Maggie Hassan and ethics lawyer Norm Eisen have demanded a full accounting and urged repayment or legal review.
White House: Trump Will Not Repay Taxpayers For $10M In Campaign-Style DHS Ads

President Donald Trump will not reimburse the federal government for roughly $10 million already spent on a series of campaign-style advertisements produced using Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funds, the White House confirmed.
On Monday night the president wrote on Truth Social that he would "pay for them myself" and suggested a Trump-linked political action committee might cover future costs. The White House later clarified that Mr. Trump "was not referring to reimbursement" for funds already expended.
Funding, Production, And What’s In The Ads
Members of Congress investigating the campaign say DHS budgeted about $20 million for the ad series and that roughly $10 million has already been spent. The administration has also reportedly spent more than $2 million buying national television airtime, where the ads have aired hundreds of times.
The White House characterizes the spots as "presidential public service announcements" intended to "explain policy and make the case for the nation's direction," comparing them to prior government campaigns such as Medicare enrollment outreach, anti-drug messaging, Affordable Care Act enrollment efforts and COVID-19 vaccination drives.
Critics note that several videos echo campaign messaging: one appears to be taken directly from the president’s 2024 campaign materials and frames the struggle as a "final battle" against "globalists" and "warmongers." Another spot used the song "Love Me" by singer-songwriter JMSN; the artist has issued a cease-and-desist demanding the administration stop using his music. Each ad concludes with the on-screen caption "Paid for by the U.S. Government."
Legal And Political Pushback
Legal experts and lawmakers from both parties have criticized the ads as a potential misuse of taxpayer dollars and a violation of federal restrictions on partisan political propaganda. Former White House ethics lawyer Norm Eisen called the spots "an unlawful and outrageous misuse of public funds."
"Federal law forbids using taxpayer dollars for political propaganda, which this clearly is," said Eisen.
Senator Maggie Hassan, a senior Democrat on the Joint Economic Committee, has demanded a detailed accounting of the ad costs, the funding sources, any outside contractors and which federal agencies and employees were involved. She called the ads "clearly wrong and clearly illegal" and urged immediate repayment.
Practical and legal limits complicate the president's promise to personally cover the ads: federal law bars presidents from directing or controlling a super PAC's spending decisions, and it is unclear how Mr. Trump would legally effectuate repayment or personal payment for ads already run.
What To Watch
Congressional inquiries and potential legal challenges are likely to press the administration for full documentation of costs and procurement actions. The dispute raises broader questions about the boundary between official public messaging and partisan campaigning when taxpayer funds are used.
Help us improve.

































