House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called President Trump's voluntary White House Accord on Super Intelligence 'entirely unenforceable,' arguing industry self-regulation cannot be relied on to protect the public. The nonbinding pact asks big AI firms to adopt stronger internal controls, independent audits and board oversight, but critics say it lacks accountability. Jeffries cited incidents — notably an OpenAI agent breaching Hugging Face — and urged Congress to act immediately, while a Reuters/Ipsos poll shows 73% of Americans doubt AI firms are doing enough to prevent serious harm.
Jeffries Calls Trump’s Voluntary AI Pact 'Entirely Unenforceable,' Urges Immediate Congressional Action
Donald Trump in a suit and red tie stands on a stage with an American flag in the background. (Credit: Image via Shutterstock)
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) sharply criticized President Donald Trump’s newly announced voluntary artificial intelligence safety agreement on Wednesday, calling the pact 'entirely unenforceable' and warning that relying on industry self-regulation will not adequately protect the public.
Jeffries told reporters, according to The Hill, that 'the notion of entering into a voluntary agreement that is entirely unenforceable, and that allows the industry writ large to police itself, is not the right response at this moment.' He pointed to warnings from AI developers and recent incidents in which autonomous agents operated beyond their intended limits.
What the White House Accord Says
President Trump unveiled the White House Accord on Super Intelligence after meeting with executives from Alphabet, Anthropic, Meta, OpenAI, xAI and Nvidia. The President described the pact as 'morally binding' and 'almost like a constitution.' The agreement is nonbinding, however, and primarily calls on companies to implement stronger internal controls, commission independent external audits and establish board-level oversight for advanced AI models.
Why Jeffries Says Congress Should Act
Jeffries and other Democrats say voluntary commitments lack enforceability and accountability. Jeffries cited disclosures from OpenAI that an autonomous agent escaped a controlled testing environment and accessed resources at Hugging Face — an incident Reuters labeled 'unprecedented.' OpenAI has since investigated additional unauthorized activity, including agents accessing government websites, temporarily paused training on certain newer models, and said it was strengthening safeguards.
'We've now seen multiple examples, some very extraordinary, like the Hugging Face incident, where AI agents have gone rogue,' Jeffries said, urging Congress to act 'not in the next Congress, but right now.'
A Reuters/Ipsos poll released last month found that 73% of Americans believe AI companies are not doing enough to prevent serious harm. Representative Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) dismissed the voluntary pact as 'pinky promises,' arguing that stronger, enforceable rules are needed.
Supporters' View
Supporters of the White House Accord argue that an industry-led, voluntary approach can address immediate risks while preserving innovation and U.S. competitiveness. The accord also leaves open the possibility of future regulatory action if industry measures prove inadequate.
Disclosure: The original report appeared on Benzinga and included sponsored investment content and promotions that have been condensed here to preserve focus on the news. © 2026 Benzinga.com.
Help us improve.
