A pooled analysis of 19 studies encompassing about 34,000 high achievers finds that exceptional early performance does not reliably predict who will be elite as adults. The authors, led by Arne Güllich and published in Science, report a negative correlation between early peak performance and highest adult performance — for example, youth and adult top-10 chess lists overlap by only about 10%. The review warns that early specialization can produce short-term gains but that later, broader development is more often linked to sustained elite success, while also noting methodological limits and mental-health concerns tied to intense early focus.
Child Prodigies Rarely Stay At The Very Top As Adults — Nearly 90% Diverge, Study Finds

Remember the child who always beat you at chess? New research suggests most childhood prodigies do not remain the highest achievers in adulthood.
What the Review Analyzed
Researchers led by Arne Güllich of RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau pooled evidence from 19 studies covering roughly 34,000 high performers across fields such as Nobel laureates, elite musicians, top chess players, and Olympic champions. Their analysis, published in Science, examined links between early peak performance and later adult eminence.
Key Findings
"Across the highest adult performance levels, peak performance is negatively correlated with early performance."
The review found that early peak achievement often does not predict who will occupy the top ranks as an adult. A striking example: the researchers estimate that the players who ranked among the world top-10 as youths are nearly 90% different from those who rank among the world top-10 as adults — meaning most youth stars are not the same people at the summit later on.
Why This Happens
The authors suggest several reasons. Child prodigies frequently specialize intensively in a single discipline early on, which can deliver quick gains but may limit broader development. By contrast, late bloomers often explore multiple domains before specializing, and this diversified development appears to correlate more strongly with sustained elite performance later in life.
Context And Caveats
The study does not deny that talented children often enjoy advantages: a 2023 study cited by the authors found that prodigies tend to earn higher incomes and report greater career success than average peers. However, Güllich and colleagues emphasize that early, field-specific progress tends to create short-term success, while late development is more commonly associated with long-term elite outcomes.
The authors also acknowledge limitations. Their review combined two designs — prospective studies that follow high-performing children over time and retrospective studies that reconstruct the childhoods of successful adults — so causal claims are limited. Researchers note it is impossible to randomly assign children to career paths, and they call for more longitudinal and mechanism-focused work to clarify how early experiences shape later achievement.
Health And Developmental Risks
Earlier research raises additional concerns about intensive early specialization. A 2018 NIH study reported that gifted children showed poorer perceptions of their physical health and faced higher risks to mental health compared with non-gifted peers, warning that highly gifted children may be vulnerable in terms of wellbeing.
Bottom Line
This review cautions against equating childhood brilliance with guaranteed adult eminence. While early talent matters, the long game often favors breadth, resilience, and continued development — qualities more typical of late bloomers.
Help us improve.


































