USC researchers propose selectively advantageous instability, or SAI, a generalization that posits some molecular and genetic instability can benefit cells by increasing diversity and adaptability. The same instability carries energy and material costs that may generate harmful cells and contribute to aging and disease. The idea, published in Frontiers in Aging, frames instability as a functional biological strategy with broad implications for aging, disease, and cellular dynamics.
Scientists Propose a New Biological 'Rule': Selectively Advantageous Instability (SAI) — When Cellular Instability Helps and Hurts
Instability Could Be Necessary Rule of BiologyAndriy Onufriyenko - Getty Images
Biologists debate dozens of broad generalizations that describe patterns in life. Now researchers at the University of Southern California propose adding a provocative new one: selectively advantageous instability, or SAI. Their argument, published in Frontiers in Aging, suggests that controlled instability in cellular components can sometimes benefit cells and organisms, even as it creates costs that contribute to aging and disease.
What Is Selectively Advantageous Instability?
SAI describes situations in which instability of genes, proteins, or other cellular components is favored because it increases adaptability. Rather than preserving a single optimal form, cells may tolerate or even promote turnover and change so different variants can be beneficial in different cellular states.
According to USC molecular biologist John Towers, ongoing degradation and replacement of proteins and RNAs indicates that instability is an integral part of life. He notes that a normal gene and a mutant can coexist in a population if each is advantageous under different conditions.
Why Instability Can Be Useful
SAI can increase genetic and phenotypic diversity within tissues and cell populations. That diversity can improve resilience when conditions change, because different variants may perform better in alternate states, environments, or stressors. Many cellular systems appear tuned for short component lifespans, and that turnover can help maintain cellular function by removing damaged parts and enabling flexible responses.
The Costs: Energy, Damage, and Aging
Instability is not free. Maintaining high rates of molecular turnover and tolerating mutations consume energy and materials, and they can produce deleterious cells. The USC paper highlights that these costs may contribute to classical signs of aging, such as increased mortality risk and reduced reproductive fitness. In other words, SAI may be both a survival strategy and a driver of long-term decline.
Evidence, Context, and Broader Links
The SAI concept builds on observed cellular mechanisms such as protease- and nuclease-mediated turnover and the everyday replacement of proteins and RNAs in even the simplest cells. The authors also note conceptual links between SAI and ideas from chaos theory and discussions about emergent cellular behaviors. The proposal joins other widely cited biological generalizations like Allen's Rule and Bergmann's Rule, which describe patterns rather than absolute laws.
Implications for Research and Medicine
Understanding when and how instability is advantageous could reshape approaches to aging, cancer, infectious disease, and cellular engineering. If researchers can identify the circumstances under which SAI helps organisms adapt versus when it becomes pathological, they may be able to design interventions that preserve benefits while limiting harms.
Final Thoughts
SAI does not overturn the importance of stability in biology. Instead, it argues that a measured amount of instability is a recurring and potentially functional feature of life. As with other biological rules, it should be treated as a broad generalization that invites testing and refinement rather than a fixed law.
Publication: The study proposing SAI was published in Frontiers in Aging and includes contributions from researchers at the University of Southern California.
Help us improve.
