Television host Jesse Watters on Monday praised the Department of Defense’s decision to open an investigation into Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), saying authorities must “make examples out of people.” The review follows a video in which Kelly appears to urge service members not to follow certain orders and could lead to his recall to active duty or court-martial proceedings.
Comments from on-air panelists
Speaking on a broadcast panel, Watters welcomed the military’s involvement and framed the probe as a hallmark of what he described as “Donald Trump 2.0.” He said the country cannot tolerate what he called interference from a so-called “deep state” and added:
“You can’t have the deep state interfering with a duly elected presidency and get away with it. You gotta draw the line in the sand and you have to make examples out of people.”
Another panelist, Kennedy, suggested Kelly may face consequences for what she labeled the FAFO — “F*ck Around, Find Out” — doctrine, arguing that those who have sworn the military oath are judged by different standards than civilians. She said servicemembers she has spoken with were offended by the video and emphasized the distinction between lawful dissent and conduct that could undermine military discipline.
Pentagon review and legal context
The Pentagon announced the review after former President Donald Trump criticized Kelly in a Truth Social post, saying the video participants “should be in jail right now.” In its statement the department said it had received “serious allegations of misconduct against Captain Mark Kelly, USN (Ret.).” The statement referenced the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. § 688) and noted that retirees may remain subject to the UCMJ for applicable offenses. It also cited federal law (18 U.S.C. § 2387), which prohibits actions intended to interfere with the loyalty, morale, or good order and discipline of the armed forces.
The Pentagon said it will conduct a thorough review to determine whether to recall Kelly to active duty for court-martial proceedings or pursue administrative measures. The department reminded service members that they are legally obligated to obey lawful orders, which are presumed lawful under the UCMJ.
Kelly's response
Sen. Kelly responded to the unfolding controversy with a statement defending his record and refusing to be intimidated. He said:
“I’ve given too much to this country to be silenced by bullies who care more about their own power than protecting the Constitution.”
As the review proceeds, legal experts say outcomes could range from no action to administrative penalties or criminal proceedings if violations of the UCMJ or federal law are substantiated.
