CRBC News

Belém Climate Talks Secure Finance for Vulnerable Nations — Final Text Omits Explicit Fossil Fuel Phaseout

The UN climate talks in Belém concluded with an agreement to mobilize finance to help countries hit hardest by climate change. Delegates secured commitments aimed at improving access to funds for recovery and adaptation. However, the final text did not include an explicit call to phase out fossil fuels, a demand made by many campaigners and some nations.

Delegates at the United Nations climate talks in Belém concluded negotiations with an agreement to mobilize financial support for countries suffering the impacts of climate change. The deal focuses on directing funds to vulnerable nations to help cope with severe weather, sea-level rise, and other climate-related harms.

What the agreement delivers

The final text commits parties to efforts to scale up finance for affected countries, including measures to improve access to funding and to support recovery and adaptation. Many delegates described the outcome as a pragmatic step toward addressing the growing financing needs of nations on the front lines of climate impacts.

What was left out

Notably, the agreement does not include an explicit call to phase out fossil fuels. Campaigners and some countries had pushed for stronger language on reducing fossil fuel use, but the final wording stops short of that demand. Instead, the text emphasizes financial mobilization and broader transitions to low-emission and climate-resilient development without mandating a specific fossil fuel timeline.

Reactions and next steps

Vulnerable countries welcomed the pledge of increased funding, while many environmental advocates expressed disappointment that the talks did not produce clearer commitments on fossil fuel reductions. The implementation of the finance commitments will depend on follow-up negotiations, national policies, and the willingness of wealthier nations and institutions to deliver promised resources.

While the Belém talks yielded an important finance agreement, observers note that the omission of explicit fossil fuel phaseout language leaves a significant policy gap as the world seeks deeper emissions cuts.

Similar Articles