CRBC News

Putin: Trump's 28‑Point Ukraine Plan Could Be a 'Basis' for Settlement — Kyiv Opposes

President Trump is urging Ukraine to accept a 28-point peace plan that he says could end the conflict. Vladimir Putin called the proposal a possible 'basis' for a final settlement, while accusing Kyiv of rejecting it. Ukrainian leaders say the plan must respect their sovereignty, and analysts warn that enforceable guarantees and international monitoring would be essential for any lasting deal.

Putin: Trump's 28‑Point Ukraine Plan Could Be a 'Basis' for Settlement — Kyiv Opposes

Summary: President Trump is pressing Ukraine to accept a 28-point peace proposal. Russian President Vladimir Putin said the plan could serve as the 'basis' for a final settlement and accused Kyiv of rejecting it. Reporters and analysts are weighing what the proposal — and Moscow's response — could mean for the conflict's future.

President Trump has been urging Ukrainian leaders to consider a detailed 28-point plan he presented as a path toward ending the conflict. The plan's public details remain limited, but it reportedly covers key issues such as security guarantees, territorial arrangements, reconstruction aid, and political terms intended to bring both sides to the negotiating table.

Russian President Vladimir Putin described the U.S. plan as potentially forming the 'basis' for a final settlement, framing it as a constructive proposal while also accusing Kyiv of opposing the effort. Putin's statement signals Moscow's willingness to treat the U.S. proposal as part of diplomatic negotiations, even as substantive disagreements persist.

Putin: 'This proposal could serve as the basis for a settlement, though Kyiv appears to reject it.'

Ukrainian officials have publicly pushed back, saying the plan contains elements that do not respect Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. Kyiv has emphasized the need for any agreement to guarantee Ukraine's independence and safety without conceding internationally recognized territory.

Military and security analysts say the plan's fate depends on whether its terms are negotiable for Kyiv without undermining core national interests, and whether Moscow is prepared to accept binding, verifiable guarantees. Retired Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling offered strategic perspective on the challenges of translating a multi-point diplomatic proposal into enforceable outcomes, noting that political will and international monitoring would be essential.

What happens next is uncertain. Diplomatic backchannels, third-party mediators, and further public statements from Kyiv, Washington and Moscow will shape whether the 28-point proposal becomes the starting point for negotiations or another point of contention. Observers caution that rhetoric from leaders can shift quickly, and practical talks will require compromise, verification mechanisms and often lengthy implementation timelines.

Background: The 28-point plan was put forward by President Trump as a comprehensive framework aimed at ending active hostilities. While some see it as a possible template for negotiations, critics argue key issues remain unaddressed or are too favorable to one side. The plan's details and diplomatic reception will determine its real impact on the ground.

Similar Articles