New research by Way to Win and Lake Research Partners finds that populist economic and specific anti‑corruption messages persuade low‑motivation and persuadable voters more effectively than centrist cultural moderation or attacks on Donald Trump. Dial‑testing in six battleground states moved the generic ballot from Democrats trailing 43–44 to leading 48–39. The study suggests that concrete promises and evidence of Democrats delivering results are essential to winning low‑turnout midterms.
Populist Economic and Anti‑Corruption Messages Win Over Swing Voters — Not Attacks on Trump
Bashing Trump Isn’t the Best Way to Win These Fickle Voters
New research from the progressive donor network Way to Win and polling firm Lake Research Partners indicates that Democrats are likelier to persuade low‑motivation and persuadable voters ahead of the midterms by emphasizing populist economic themes and concrete anti‑corruption examples — rather than moderating cultural positions or simply attacking Donald Trump.
What The Study Did
The two groups dial‑tested messages with narrowly defined persuadable constituencies: low‑motivation Democrats and independents, some 2024 Trump voters who view the economy negatively, and voters who hold unfavorable views of both parties. The research focused on six states — Arizona, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, Nevada and Texas — chosen for their growing, younger and more diverse electorates that could decide both this fall and future contests.
Key Findings
Messages that framed politics as a fight for everyday economic fairness and that named specific harms from corruption performed best. Effective lines included "Our leaders should be fighting to make all of our lives better" and calls to "stand up to right‑wing corporate interests that hold influence in both political parties." Concrete examples — no‑bid contracts, donor favors, ballroom events, monuments and corporate price‑gouging — made the anti‑corruption message tangible and persuasive.
"We've tested the conservative message, and we trounced it," said Celinda Lake of Lake Research Partners.
At the start of testing, the generic ballot was nearly tied, with Democrats down 43–44. After exposure to the effective messages, Democrats moved ahead 48–39.
Why This Matters
The results suggest that aiming for a centrist pitch may only capture a narrow band of voters, while a robust populist economic and anti‑fraud narrative can broaden appeal among the swing constituencies Democrats need in low‑turnout midterms. Turnout typically falls from roughly 60% in presidential years to below 50% in midterms, making persuadable, low‑motivation voters especially consequential.
Way to Win co‑founder Jenifer Fernandez Ancona said many respondents liked Democratic themes in principle but doubted candidates would deliver change. That skepticism appears to be easing: respondents are increasingly receptive to promises of a "government that works" and one that "prioritizes people."
Crucially, voters do not respond well to a steady stream of partisan attacks. They want concrete plans and evidence that officials can and will follow through. Local examples of Democrats delivering results — such as New York City Councilmember Zohran Mamdani’s efforts to implement policy locally — help convince skeptical voters that change is achievable.
Bottom Line
Targeting persuadable voters with concrete populist economic and anti‑corruption messages appears to be a more effective path to winning key midterm contests than trying to placate Trump voters with centrist cultural positions or relying on partisan attacks.
Help us improve.
