Draft CPS Guidance: A Crown Prosecution Service draft for England and Wales would treat male circumcision as a potential form of child abuse, grouping it with other 'harmful practices' such as exorcisms.
Reaction: Jewish and Muslim leaders have strongly objected, arguing the practice is a central and generally safe religious rite. The draft has intensified debate between child-protection concerns and religious-freedom advocates.
Under a draft Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) document for England and Wales, male circumcision could be classed as a potential form of child abuse and listed alongside other so-called 'harmful practices' such as exorcisms.
The proposal has alarmed Jewish and Muslim leaders, who say circumcision is a central religious rite and a generally safe medical and cultural practice. Community groups warn that the draft would criminalize long-standing religious traditions and could strain relations between faith communities and the state.
Supporters of reviewing practices argue the draft seeks to clarify when interventions are needed to protect children. Critics counter that a blanket classification risks undermining religious liberty and trust in public services. The document is currently a draft and does not represent final CPS policy; any changes would require further review and formal adoption before becoming law or guidance for prosecutors.
If the CPS proceeds with the guidance, it could prompt legal challenges, consultations with religious communities, and wide public debate about where to draw the line between child welfare and religious freedom. Religious and community leaders say they will press for clear protections that respect both child safety and legitimate religious practice.
Note: This coverage is based on the draft CPS document and public reactions. The story was originally published as "Brickbat: Won't Make the Cut" on Reason.com.
Help us improve.
