December Cato Institute poll: 89% of Americans aged 65+ favor preserving current Social Security benefits even if that means higher taxes on younger workers. Younger adults are more skeptical—nearly 80% under 30 expect future cuts and only about one-third expect the program to exist for them when they retire. The Social Security Trustees warn benefits could be cut by roughly 22% starting in 2032 without congressional action, yet many respondents oppose major tax increases or benefit cuts. A bipartisan commission to address finances drew broad support (71%).
Cato Survey: 89% Of Seniors Support Higher Taxes On Younger Workers To Preserve Social Security Benefits
Nearly 90% Of Seniors Support Higher Taxes On Younger Workers To Maintain Current Social Security Benefits, Survey Says
A December survey from the Cato Institute highlights a widening generational divide over how to sustain Social Security. The poll shows strong support among older Americans for preserving current retiree benefits even if that requires higher taxes on younger workers, while younger cohorts are more skeptical about the program's future and more open to reforms.
Key Survey Findings
The survey found that 89% of respondents aged 65 and older want to protect existing retiree benefits even if it means higher taxes for younger workers; just 11% of seniors favored cutting benefits to shield younger generations from tax increases. Support for protecting benefits increased steadily with age: 47% of 18–29-year-olds prioritized retirees, compared with 74% of 45–54-year-olds and 84% of 55–64-year-olds.
Young adults expressed deep skepticism about Social Security’s long-term viability: nearly eight in 10 respondents under age 30 expect future benefit cuts, and only about one-third believe the program will still exist in its current form when they retire. The poll also found that 60% of respondents view Social Security as a retirement savings program they paid into rather than a welfare program.
Fiscal Context And Public Preferences
The survey arrives as the Social Security Board of Trustees warns of mounting financial pressures: their latest annual report projects that, absent congressional action, benefits could be reduced by roughly 22% beginning in 2032. At the same time, many survey respondents opposed specific fixes analysts say may be necessary—77% opposed cutting benefits for current and future retirees and the same share opposed paying an additional $1,300 a year in payroll taxes.
Popular Reforms And Political Implications
One proposal that drew broad support was creating an independent, bipartisan commission to address the program’s finances—71% of respondents backed this idea. The results underscore a difficult political trade-off: while Americans broadly want to preserve Social Security, they disagree sharply on who should pay and resist many of the discrete policy changes that could close the funding gap.
What This Means
Policymakers face a narrow path: balancing intergenerational equity, retirees’ expectations, and fiscal reality. The survey signals that any long-term solution will require clear communication, compromise across age groups, and politically viable options that address both revenues and benefits.
Note: The survey results cited here are from the Cato Institute poll published in December; the Trustees' projection is from the Social Security Board of Trustees' most recent annual report.
Help us improve.
