New research finds rising microplastic levels in human brains. A University of New Mexico study reports about seven grams of plastic per brain on average and nearly a 50% increase in 2024 samples versus samples from eight years earlier. Higher levels were observed in brains from people with dementia, though causation is not established. Scientists are expanding studies, while policymakers and individuals pursue ways to reduce plastic pollution and exposure.
Microplastics Found to Be Rising in Human Brains — New Study Reports About 7g per Brain and a 50% Increase
New research finds rising microplastic levels in human brains. A University of New Mexico study reports about seven grams of plastic per brain on average and nearly a 50% increase in 2024 samples versus samples from eight years earlier. Higher levels were observed in brains from people with dementia, though causation is not established. Scientists are expanding studies, while policymakers and individuals pursue ways to reduce plastic pollution and exposure.

Microplastics Are Turning Up in Human Brains — What the New Study Found
Plastic pollution is no longer just an environmental problem: researchers report that tiny plastic particles are appearing inside human tissues, including the brain. A recent study led by scientists at the University of New Mexico found that brain tissue samples collected in 2024 contained nearly 50% more microplastics than samples taken about eight years earlier. On average, the researchers estimated roughly seven grams of plastic per brain—comparable in weight to a disposable plastic spoon.
Key findings and caveats
Researchers also observed higher microplastic concentrations in brains from people who had dementia. The lab emphasized that this could reflect a compromised blood–brain barrier in those individuals, which may make it harder to clear foreign particles, rather than proving that microplastics cause dementia. Similar plastic fragments have been detected in the placenta, bloodstream, and even in a newborn's first stool.
"This stuff is increasing in our world exponentially," toxicologist Dr. Matthew Campen told The New York Times, summarizing the broader environmental trend reflected in human tissues.
What scientists know — and don't yet know
Some microplastic particles are small enough to cross biological barriers and lodge in organs. Early research links microplastic exposure to a range of concerns — from immune and hormonal disruption to possible cognitive and developmental effects — but evidence is still emerging and does not yet define a clear safe-exposure threshold or direct cause-and-effect relationships for most conditions.
Broader implications
Microplastics are ubiquitous: they contaminate air, water, soil and food chains, posing potential risks to wildlife, ecosystems and public health. The issue spans scientific, public-health and environmental policy domains and has prompted action at multiple levels.
Policy, research and practical steps
Policymakers and researchers are responding. Several countries have moved to ban or restrict common single-use plastics, and some U.S. cities limit items such as Styrofoam and plastic produce bags. Scientists are developing more degradable materials and pilot technologies to filter microplastics from drinking water and wastewater. At home, individuals can reduce their exposure by:
- choosing reusable containers and bags instead of single-use plastics,
- avoiding microwaving food in plastic containers,
- using microfiber-capturing laundry filters or bags, and
- reducing reliance on heavily packaged products.
Ongoing research
Campen's team and others are continuing to investigate where microplastics accumulate within the brain and whether particular regions show higher concentrations or associations with conditions such as Parkinson's disease or memory disorders. As research progresses, clearer evidence will help guide risk assessment, regulation and mitigation strategies.
Bottom line: The discovery of microplastics in human brains adds urgency to efforts to limit plastic pollution and to better understand the potential health consequences. Current findings are concerning but preliminary; more research is needed to establish definitive links and safe exposure levels.
