The Democratic Socialists of America have supported nearly 200 candidates in the 2026 cycle, claiming 67 wins, 60 losses and 64 undecided races as of Sept. 22. High-profile victories — and rising progressive nominees like Abdul El-Sayed and Darializa Avila Chevalier — are forcing Democrats to choose between remaining a broad, center-left coalition or shifting toward democratic socialism. The author warns such a shift could alienate older voters and urges the party to prioritize clear, moderate messaging.
Can Democrats Contain the DSA's Momentum? What 200 Endorsed Candidates Mean for 2026

A recurring presence is unsettling Democratic fundraisers, dinners and policy forums: the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). The group even labels its federal donation page "Socialist Cash Takes Out Capitalist Trash."
A review of the DSA's election tracker shows the organization has backed or strongly supported nearly 200 candidates during the 2026 cycle. As of Sept. 22, the tracker reported 67 victories, 60 defeats and 64 races still undecided, including several high-profile contests.
Many DSA endorsements are for local posts — for example, a Ramsey County commissioner in Minnesota — but several endorsed candidates have become nationally visible, prompting debates within the Democratic Party about its future direction.
Prominent Races and Candidates
Abdul El-Sayed, a former Detroit public health official and epidemiologist, emerged as Michigan's Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate after defeating more moderate Rep. Haley Stevens in the primary. El-Sayed identifies as a progressive rather than a democratic socialist, though he has drawn support from prominent democratic socialists and appeared at events alongside controversial online commentator Hasan Piker. Some past online posts attributed to him — later deleted — noted his grief for both American and Arab casualties of 9/11 and subsequent wars.
Angie Nixon, Florida state representative and Democratic U.S. Senate nominee, is listed as a member of her local DSA chapter.
In New York, pro-Palestinian activist Darializa Avila Chevalier defeated Rep. Adriano Espaillat in a Democratic primary widely seen as decisive for the congressional seat. Observers, including Politico, described the result as "a massive victory for the Democratic Socialists of America and Mayor Zohran Mamdani," underscoring the DSA's growing influence in the city.
Avila Chevalier — a sociology Ph.D. student and a former lead organizer of Columbia University's pro-Palestinian encampment — won despite the resurfacing and subsequent deletion of social media posts that called for abolishing police and borders, referenced Vladimir Lenin and included other provocative language. When Republican ads labeled her a "communist," she told MSNOW, "I won't be reactive."
What This Means for the Democratic Party
Scroll through the roughly 200 candidates listed on the DSA site and a pattern emerges: progressive nominees with strong left-wing ties are competing in races across the country. That reality forces a strategic choice for Democrats: maintain a broad, center-left coalition or shift substantially toward democratic socialism.
Leaning toward democratic socialism would be a high-stakes gamble. Young voters are relatively receptive — nearly half of those under 35 express at least some positive feelings about socialism — but older cohorts remain skeptical. According to a CBS News/YouGov poll, just 9% of Americans have a "very positive" view of socialism.
The DSA platform includes proposals that poll poorly with many voters: transferring major corporations, banks and utilities to public ownership; adopting universal rent control; cancelling all student debt; and pursuing a Green New Deal that envisions a full transition to renewable energy. Those policy positions could complicate general-election prospects for Democratic nominees tied to the DSA.
Organizational and Cultural Challenges
A structural weakness for Democrats is the party's limited appetite for publicly distancing itself from allies on the far left. Practices such as "progressive stacking" — prioritizing speakers from historically marginalized groups in meetings — are embedded in DSA chapter bylaws nationwide. Within this cultural context, many Democratic leaders have been reluctant to openly repudiate DSA activists or call the party platform "problematic."
"What everyone I know wants is sanity. The party that's not crazy first could be in power for 30 years," a Kentucky businesswoman told the author.
The author argues Democrats will probably accommodate their far-left elements but hopes they choose restraint and clearer, more centrist messaging. Both major parties, he suggests, would benefit from prioritizing coherent, moderate appeals to the broad electorate.
Wilfred Reilly, an associate professor of political science at Kentucky State University and author of Taboo: 10 Facts You Can't Talk About and Hate Crime Hoax, originally wrote this opinion piece for USA TODAY.
Help us improve.




























