At Rusty Eck Ford's Quick Lane in Wichita, Kansas, a racial slur was entered into the service system during a July 27 visit and subsequently printed on oil-change reminder stickers for four vehicles. The dealership informed affected customers on September 7 and fired two employees: the person who typed the slur and another who deleted it from the system without reporting it. The Martins said an apology is insufficient, and the case raises questions about software safeguards, internal reporting requirements, and oversight of customer-facing systems.
Ford Dealership Fires Two Employees After Racial Slur Printed On Oil-Change Stickers
A black sports car and a grey sedan parked before a weathered brick building
Larry Martin picked up his truck from Rusty Eck Ford's Quick Lane in Wichita, Kansas, on July 27 and drove it for weeks without realizing that an oil-change reminder sticker on his windshield contained a racial slur.
The dealership did not inform Martin until September 7—more than a month after the service visit—by which time the same offensive term had been printed on reminder stickers for three other vehicles.
What the Dealership Found
Rusty Eck Ford's internal investigation concluded that the incident began when an employee serviced his own car and typed the slur into the service system while generating a reminder sticker. Rather than remaining confined to that one sticker, the offensive entry persisted in the software and continued to print on subsequent stickers.
A second employee later discovered the term in the system and deleted it, but did not report the discovery to management. Because the deletion was not escalated, the problem persisted until a customer complaint surfaced the issue.
"It's humiliating. It carries a lot of weight," said Larry Martin. His daughter, Kelsey, added: "No one deserves to be humiliated like this. An apology just isn't enough."
Actions Taken And Outstanding Questions
After reconstructing the events, Rusty Eck Ford terminated both employees: the person who entered the slur and the person who removed it without reporting the incident. The family met with dealership representatives, and the dealership issued an apology saying it "does not tolerate racial, hateful, discriminatory, or otherwise inappropriate conduct in the workplace." The company declined to answer reporters' questions on camera.
While firing the two staffers addresses the immediate misconduct, the episode raises broader concerns: why did a customer-facing service system lack safeguards or review steps, and why did internal checks fail to catch offensive entries that reached four vehicles before a customer complaint exposed the problem?
Why It Matters
This case highlights how a single offensive entry in a digital system can propagate widely and the importance of clear reporting requirements, routine audits of customer-facing communications, and staff training to ensure harmful content is caught and escalated promptly. The incident underlines the reputational risk for long-standing local businesses and the limits of an apology when customers feel deeply wronged.
Help us improve.
