The husband of a Taiwanese woman used a robot vacuum’s camera to record her alleged affair and won NT$500,000 in civil court. However, criminal judges found he deliberately activated the device to record private activity and convicted him for illegally obtaining images. He received five months’ imprisonment and a NT$150,000 fine; Taiwanese law allows up to three years and NT$300,000 for secret recordings.
Robot-Vacuum Footage Wins Husband NT$500,000 — He’s Later Jailed for Illegally Recording It
Cheng Chia Huang/Getty Images News via Getty Images
A Taiwanese husband used a robot vacuum's camera to capture footage of his wife with another man, won NT$500,000 in civil damages, and was later convicted in criminal court for the way he obtained the recording. The Taoyuan District Court found the husband guilty of illegally recording private images and on August 18 sentenced him to five months in prison and a NT$150,000 fine (about US$5,000).
'90 Day Fiancé' Star Thais Ramone Lawyers Up Amid Patrick Mendes Custody Fight
What Happened
The case began in September 2023 when the husband discovered an unfamiliar toothbrush at the couple’s holiday property in Guishan, Taoyuan. After reviewing parking garage CCTV footage that identified a man who had driven his wife home, the husband’s suspicions grew.
Marcellus Wiley Sued Over Alleged Unpaid $500K Loan Before Domestic Battery Arrest
On December 24, 2023, he remotely activated the home robot vacuum via its mobile app. He told the court he initially intended to use the device’s audio feature to talk to his wife, but when the live camera feed showed another man inside the house he began recording. The footage reportedly showed the woman changing clothes, embracing the man and moving around the residence unclothed.
'90 Day Fiancé' Star Thais Ramone Says Patrick Mendes' Cheating Claim Was Filed 'In Error'
Civil And Criminal Proceedings
Using the recording as evidence, the husband filed a civil lawsuit against his wife and the man, claiming infringement of his marital rights and seeking NT$2 million in damages. The civil court concluded the relationship exceeded ordinary friendship and awarded NT$500,000 (approximately US$16,000) in compensation.
The wife subsequently filed a criminal complaint over the recording itself. The husband argued that because the civil court accepted the footage as evidence, creating it must have been lawful. The criminal court rejected that defense, noting the husband deliberately activated the recording after seeing another man on the live feed — a deliberate act rather than an accidental capture. The court therefore ruled the method of obtaining the evidence was illegal even though the footage proved the affair.
Legal Context
Under Taiwanese law, secretly recording or disclosing another person’s private activities without consent can carry up to three years in prison and a fine of up to NT$300,000 (about US$9,500). The five-month sentence and NT$150,000 fine given in this case fall well below those maximums.
Implications
The case highlights a legal distinction: evidence that proves a wrongdoing can still be inadmissible or obtained unlawfully if the method of collection violates privacy laws. Even when a civil court awards damages based on such evidence, criminal liability for the gathering method may still apply.
Help us improve.
