Richmond, California has long depended on Chevron's refinery for jobs and tax revenue, but safety incidents — most notably a 2012 pipeline rupture that sent about 15,000 people for medical care — have driven demands for greater corporate accountability. In 2024 Chevron agreed to a $550 million settlement to remove a proposed refinery tax, a deal hailed by city leaders but feared by some residents who warn of lost jobs and revenue. Richmond now faces the difficult task of protecting public health and holding Chevron accountable while preserving its economic base.
Richmond vs. Chevron: Socialist-Led City Pushes For Accountability — At What Cost?
Socialist-run California city takes on Chevron while residents worry about long-term consequences
Richmond, California, has long been defined by one dominant presence: Chevron's sprawling refinery. The plant — completed in 1902, three years before the city incorporated — has provided jobs and millions in tax revenue for generations. Yet after high-profile safety incidents and rising activism, Richmond's democratic-socialist leadership and the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA) have shifted the relationship toward confrontation and demands for stricter oversight.
Chevron has retreated from Richmond politics over the last two decades. The Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA) has gained power, operating on an agenda critical of Big Oil.(Fox News)
A Century of Influence—and a Turning Point
Former Mayor Tom Butt recalls a time when major developers, industries and lobbyists, especially Chevron, held outsized influence in Richmond politics. 'I think it's pretty much a fact that for 100 years Chevron pretty much controlled the city of Richmond,' Butt told reporters, describing how the RPA's rise in the mid-2000s disrupted that status quo. By the early 2000s the refinery employed more than 1,300 people and covered about 2,900 acres, underscoring its economic significance to the region.
Chevron once had major influence over the city of Richmond, but that changed as a local progressive alliance gained power.
Safety Incidents That Shaped Public Opinion
Residents point to multiple incidents that eroded trust. In March 1999 a refinery explosion and fire released toxic fumes and prompted shelter-in-place warnings; several emergency responders were injured. A more consequential event came in August 2012, when a ruptured pipeline released flammable light gas oil that formed an opaque vapor cloud and ignited roughly two minutes later. The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) found severe corrosion on the pipe and concluded Chevron had not fully implemented previous recommendations to inspect or replace vulnerable equipment. In the weeks after the fire, roughly 15,000 people sought medical attention for symptoms including breathing problems and chest pain.
Former Chevron employee and mayoral candidate Mark Wassberg says that Richmond taxes would skyrocket, and the city would be "doomed" if Chevron were to pack up the local refinery.
'The imbalance we see today stems from a lack of accountability and compassion among multibillion-dollar corporations,' said Richmond Mayor Eduardo Martinez, an RPA member. 'True balance will be achieved only when corporations operate responsibly and give equal consideration to the needs of the communities they impact.'
Politics, Payments, And The Risk Of Economic Fallout
Those safety concerns helped fuel political momentum for stricter oversight and higher community contributions from Chevron. In 2024 the Richmond City Council approved an agreement in which Chevron agreed to pay $550 million in exchange for removing a proposed refinery tax from the ballot. Chevron characterized the deal as a way to ensure continued, reliable energy for Northern California.
Stephen London, a Richmond, California resident, told Fox News Digital that he gives the RPA credit for the $550 Chevron settlement. But, he said the plan may have "backfired" as the oil company had partially retreated from California to Texas.
While city leaders framed the settlement as a victory for accountability and public health, some residents and former employees warned of the economic risks associated with sustained pressure on the company. Former refinery worker Mark Wassberg noted the difficulty of replacing high-paying refinery jobs with green-energy positions and said the workforce once paid roughly $1,400 per week. Critics also point to Chevron moving its corporate headquarters from San Ramon to Houston as evidence that California pressure can affect corporate decisions.
Richmond City Councilmember and former Mayor Gayle McLaughlin co-founded the RPA and was a leading critic of Chevron during her time in office.
Local Divisions And The Central Dilemma
The debate in Richmond is not binary. Some residents welcome tougher oversight and the financial concessions the city extracted, while others worry that pushing Chevron too far could trigger reduced operations, job losses and lower tax revenue. Former Mayor Butt said the Chevron issue helped transform the RPA from a fringe group into a central political force, and he remains skeptical of calls to force the company out entirely.
For many in Richmond, the central policy challenge is clear: how to strengthen corporate accountability, improve public-health protections and secure compensation for affected neighborhoods without destroying the jobs and revenue that have supported the city for generations. The outcome will shape Richmond's economic and political landscape for years to come.
Note: Fox News Digital sought comment from Chevron but did not immediately receive a response.
Help us improve.
