CRBC News
Politics

Trump’s Mental Decline Is a National Emergency — Why Won’t Congress Act?

Trump’s Mental Decline Is a National Emergency — Why Won’t Congress Act?
Opinion - Trump’s decline is an emergency: Why doesn’t Congress treat it like one?

Summary: President Trump’s public statements and behavior have raised serious concerns about cognitive decline and national-security risks. Rather than pursue politically fraught remedies like immediate 25th Amendment action or impeachment, Congress should enact a narrowly tailored law giving the Gang of Eight prompt, unredacted access to presidential medical records. This proposal preserves individual privacy while ensuring bipartisan oversight of any condition that could impair a president’s ability to fulfill the duties of the office.

Opinion: The country faces a clear and present danger if the health and cognitive fitness of a sitting president remain effectively opaque. Congress should move beyond symbolic gestures and adopt a narrowly tailored, bipartisan reform to ensure elected leaders can assess presidential fitness without violating personal privacy.

I have deep respect for Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) and understand why he is sponsoring legislation to create a Commission on Presidential Capacity to Discharge the Powers and Duties of the Office under the authority of the 25th Amendment. That proposal aims at an important constitutional gap, but as currently conceived it reads more like messaging than a politically viable path to protecting the nation.

President Trump appears to be deteriorating in ways that raise genuine national-security concerns: confabulation, impulsive rhetoric, and repeated examples of poor judgment. Even before he posted a picture of himself as Jesus and published threats of extreme violence against Iran, his public remarks included baffling language — references to "nuclear dust" and claims that "they've dropped a couple of water mines… we've defeated all of their water boats, too." While such comments might invite ridicule, they also merit institutional attention when they come from the commander in chief.

It would be improper and irresponsible for nonmedical observers to claim a formal diagnosis. Still, ordinary citizens routinely recognize warning signs of cognitive decline and act to secure medical evaluation for loved ones. If a grandparent spoke and behaved like this, families would demand immediate testing and would be reluctant to allow that relative to drive, let alone command a major military force.

Because the presidency vests the nation’s most powerful military capabilities in a single person, the public has a legitimate interest in the incumbent’s fitness for office. The 25th Amendment is part of that constitutional framework, but invoking it is politically fraught and difficult. There is a more practical, narrowly tailored reform that can be enacted quickly and would respect both privacy and security.

Legislative Proposal: Congress should pass a law requiring prompt, unredacted access to the president’s relevant medical records for the Gang of Eight — the House speaker and minority leader, the Senate majority and minority leaders, and the chairs and ranking members of the House and Senate intelligence committees. Members of the Gang of Eight already receive the nation’s most sensitive intelligence and have demonstrated the capacity to protect classified information across administrations and parties.

This approach preserves private medical information from public disclosure while ensuring that a bipartisan set of congressional leaders can assess whether the president’s health poses a risk to national security. It is not an assertion that any president is presently incapacitated; rather, it is common-sense risk management. If a serious illness exists, forcing the White House to contend with it privately before it becomes a public crisis is in the national interest.

There is also a political path to enactment. Two consecutive octogenarian presidencies make this an interparty concern; many Republicans who once demanded such transparency would find this reasonable today. The Epstein Files Transparency Act passed 427–1, showing that overwhelming bipartisan support is possible for carefully framed transparency measures. A similar broad coalition could shield individual lawmakers from political backlash.

Congress should stop treating this like a rhetorical exercise and start legislating practical, narrowly drawn safeguards. Requiring Gang of Eight access to presidential medical records — with strict controls on dissemination and a clear statutory standard for what records are covered — is a measured, constitutional, and politically achievable step to protect the country.

About the author: Chris Truax is an appellate attorney who served as Southern California chair for John McCain’s 2008 primary campaign.

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Help us improve.

Related Articles

Trending