Alex Murdaugh’s defense says it is "cautiously optimistic" that alleged misconduct by court clerk Rebecca "Becky" Hill could support a new trial when the South Carolina Supreme Court hears two consolidated appeals on Feb. 11. One appeal challenges legal rulings from Murdaugh’s March 2023 conviction; the other argues Hill’s comments may have improperly influenced jurors. Hill pleaded guilty to four charges and received one year of probation—an outcome the defense says undermines her credibility on appeal.
Murdaugh Team 'Cautiously Optimistic' Clerk Misconduct Could Lead To New Trial

Alex Murdaugh’s defense team says it is "cautiously optimistic" that alleged misconduct by Colleton County court clerk Rebecca "Becky" Hill could help secure a new trial when the South Carolina Supreme Court hears consolidated appeals on Feb. 11, defense lawyer Dick Harpootlian said.
Two Consolidated Appeals
Harpootlian, who represents Murdaugh along with Jim Griffin, said the high court will consider two consolidated appeals: one challenging legal rulings made during Murdaugh’s March 2023 murder trial, and a second alleging that Clerk Rebecca Hill improperly tried to influence jurors.
Clerk Misconduct and Guilty Plea
Hill pleaded guilty in Colleton County Circuit Court to four charges: obstruction of justice and perjury related to showing sealed court exhibits to a reporter and lying about it, and two counts of misconduct in office tied to taking bonuses and using her position to promote a book she wrote about the trial. Judge Heath Taylor sentenced Hill to one year of probation and said the sentence would have been harsher if prosecutors had concluded she tampered with the jury.
"She pled guilty to perjuring herself, to lying under oath during that hearing," Harpootlian said. "I think that goes a long way to showing in appellate court that whatever she said shouldn’t be believed."
Defense’s Argument
The defense argues witnesses at an evidentiary hearing described Hill making comments to jurors about Murdaugh’s demeanor and testimony—remarks the defense says crossed the line from administrative duties into improper influence. Hill has denied attempting to sway jurors. Last year, Judge Jean Toal ruled the defense had not proven those comments changed the verdict.
Harpootlian said the defense disputes the standard applied, citing guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit that an appellant need not prove actual influence on a juror—only that the clerk said things that reasonably and objectively could have influenced jurors.
What Comes Next
Harpootlian said there are multiple potential grounds for reversal in the consolidated appeals. "There are a couple dozen different issues that have to be addressed," he said, noting any one could result in a new trial. He described the team as cautiously optimistic but emphasized that the outcome will depend on the high court’s review and questions.
Context And Author’s Note
Murdaugh was convicted in March 2023 of the 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and their youngest son, Paul, and was sentenced to life without parole. The case attracted national attention and numerous legal challenges. Harpootlian, who is promoting a new true-crime book about his prosecution of serial killer Donald "Pee Wee" Gaskins, said decades in South Carolina courtrooms inform his perspective on the justice system.
Key parties: Alex Murdaugh (defendant), Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin (defense counsel), Rebecca "Becky" Hill (court clerk), Judge Heath Taylor (sentencing), Judge Jean Toal (prior ruling).


































