The defeat of Jack Schlossberg in the June 23 Democratic primary has reignited debate about the enduring "Camelot" myth around the Kennedy family. The column argues that name recognition and media deference have often shielded the Kennedys from the consequences of personal scandals and policy failures, from JFK's affairs to Chappaquiddick and the Bay of Pigs. Schlossberg's loss, the author suggests, is a prompt to reconsider dynastic influence and place performance over pedigree.
Schlossberg Defeated — Time To Retire The ‘Camelot’ Myth

Jack Schlossberg, the only grandson of President John F. Kennedy, was defeated in New York City's Democratic congressional primary on June 23. His loss has prompted one opinion columnist to argue that the long-held "Camelot" narrative surrounding the Kennedy family may finally be coming to an end.
Coverage after the vote struck an end-of-an-era tone: as The New York Times put it, Schlossberg's defeat "dampened the dream of a renewed Camelot." But critics say nostalgia has long obscured a far more complicated and less flattering family history.
The term "Camelot" came to mean more than admiration for JFK's charisma. Over decades it evolved into the idea that the Kennedys embodied an almost sanctified form of American leadership, shielded from the ordinary consequences of politics. That reputation helped make the 33-year-old Schlossberg — son of Caroline Kennedy and Edwin Schlossberg — a media favorite early in his campaign, largely on the basis of lineage rather than policy experience.
Democratic insiders were skeptical. As longtime consultant Hank Sheinkopf told The Times, Schlossberg was "very entertaining" but "not necessarily serious." Schlossberg pushed back, telling The Associated Press that supporters backed him for his experience and ideas, not just his surname. Democratic primary voters ultimately disagreed, and his campaign struggled to translate family name recognition into a substantive platform.
Myth Versus Record
The column argues that the #MeToo era should have prompted a reappraisal of the Kennedy mystique, but that did not fully materialize. John F. Kennedy's reputation as a philanderer is widely known; some former associates and historians describe his conduct as persistent and exploitative. For example, former White House intern Mimi Alford has alleged that, when she was 19, Kennedy once directed her to perform a sexual act on another aide while he watched, and later attempted to introduce her to his brother Ted — a claim she says she rejected.
Other episodes commonly invoked to challenge the family's exalted image include Senator Ted Kennedy's role in the Chappaquiddick incident, in which Mary Jo Kopechne died and the senator reportedly delayed notifying authorities, and the 1991 trial of William Kennedy Smith on rape charges, which ended in acquittal after evidence limits. These events, along with later controversies, rarely produced a lasting collapse in the family's influence among elites.
Modern Fractures
More recently, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was estranged from parts of his family after promoting vaccine skepticism and endorsing Donald Trump; Caroline Kennedy publicly called her cousin a "predator" unfit for federal public health leadership. The columnist notes that the family's internal disputes often revolve around politics and policy as much as, or more than, alleged personal misconduct.
Schlossberg himself is not accused of the personal misconduct that has plagued other Kennedys. His weaknesses were political: a disorganized campaign and a tendency to engage in distracting online spats. Those failings, the column suggests, reveal how much of the family's political power has been sustained by reputation rather than by demonstrable accomplishment.
History, Image And Policy
The column revisits key moments from JFK's presidency to question the balance between image and outcomes. Shortly after his inauguration in 1961, about 1,400 CIA-trained Cuban exiles landed at the Bay of Pigs. Lacking promised air cover, the operation collapsed: more than 100 exiles died and roughly 1,200 were captured and held by Fidel Castro's government for about 20 months, until Attorney General Robert Kennedy secured their release for approximately $53 million in food and medicine. The fiasco is cited as helping shape Soviet perceptions of U.S. resolve and setting the stage for the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962.
The columnist compares the deference the Kennedys received to the tolerance shown to other powerful figures whose conduct would otherwise be disqualifying, arguing that elites often protect those who share their politics or social circle.
Conclusion
The opinion piece concludes that Americans should take the country’s democratic principles seriously — that political privilege should not be inherited by birthright or sustained by nostalgia. Daniel Allott, USA TODAY's conservative opinion editor, penned the column, arguing that Schlossberg's defeat is a moment to reassess the hold of political dynasties in the national imagination.
Help us improve.

























