The holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy mistrial, Michael Péguy Desronvil, was photographed with his infant daughter in an Instagram post by his attorney, who called him an "American hero." Desronvil has told media he "didn't have any doubts" about Clancy and that he was interrupted while explaining alternative theories during deliberations. Other jurors dispute that account, saying he admitted reasonable doubt but could not point to evidence of guilt. Prosecutors have not yet decided whether to seek a retrial in the deaths of Clancy's three children.
Juror Photo Stirs Controversy: Holdout Juror Pictured With Infant as Lawyer Calls Him an 'American Hero'
Getty/Edward Andrew Paltzik Composite
A photograph of the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial — Michael Péguy Desronvil — holding his infant daughter was posted to Instagram by his attorney, Edward Andrew Paltzik, who described his client as an "American hero champion of justice." The image and accompanying statement have renewed public scrutiny of the juror’s role in the high-profile mistrial.
Juror's Account and Public Statements
Desronvil has spoken to media outlets, telling TMZ he "didn't have any doubts" about Lindsay Clancy and that he was repeatedly interrupted while trying to share alternative theories during jury deliberations. In his account, he said attempts to explain those theories were cut off by fellow jurors.
Edward Andrew Paltzik
"As I tried to explain different possible theories during deliberation, I kept getting cut off as if I had doubts based on the evidence presented," Desronvil said.
Other Jurors Offer Contrasting Views
Several jurors who served on the panel have publicly challenged Desronvil's version of events. Juror Paula Devlin said Desronvil acknowledged that he had reasonable doubt, while juror Nick Dargie stated that Desronvil could not point to specific evidence supporting a finding of guilt.
The divergence in juror accounts contributed to the mistrial in the case involving the deaths of Clancy's three children — Cora, Dawson and Callan — and has intensified debate over whether a retrial is warranted.
Lindsay Clancy Crime Scene Photos - Click image to open gallery
What's Next
Prosecutors in Massachusetts have not yet announced whether they will seek a retrial. Meanwhile, the attorney’s Instagram post and the juror’s statements continue to draw public attention and commentary as legal teams and the community weigh next steps after the mistrial.
Note: This report summarizes public statements and media coverage. The mistrial means no final verdict was reached in the case.
Help us improve.
