The European Court of Justice ruled in favour of Ikea after the Belgian far-right party Vlaams Belang used the name and visual style of the retailer in November 2022 as an acronym for its anti-immigration programme. The ECJ found the use could harm Ikea's trademarks and reputation and that the party's freedom-of-expression defence did not outweigh the proprietor's rights. The Belgian court that referred the questions must now apply the ECJ's decision when issuing its ruling.
EU Court Backs Ikea After Far-Right Belgian Party Used Brand in Campaign
FILE PHOTO - A general view of the headquarters of the Ikea furniture store chain in Rostock, Germany. (is associated with: «Court backs Ikea complaint over use of brand by far-right party») Bernd Wüstneck/dpa
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Luxembourg has ruled in favour of Ikea after the far-right Belgian party Vlaams Belang used the retailer's name and visual style in campaign material.
In November 2022 the party used the name "Ikea" as an acronym for its anti-immigration programme, "Immigratie Kan Echt Anders" ("Immigration Can Be Done Differently"). In a presentation, Vlaams Belang also borrowed visual and stylistic cues from the Swedish furniture company, describing its proposals as "ready-to-assemble" political solutions.
The Swedish retailer launched legal action and the Belgian court hearing the case referred questions to the ECJ to clarify how EU trademark law should be applied. On Tuesday the court in Luxembourg found in Ikea's favour.
"The use of those IKEA trade marks may cause significant detriment to the repute of those trade marks and to the interests of their proprietor," the ECJ said. "It does not appear that the use of the IKEA trade marks for the sole purpose of taking advantage of their reputation in order to reinforce a political message and increase its dissemination takes precedence over the rights and interests of the proprietor of those trade marks."
The judges concluded there was a real risk of harm to Ikea's trademarks and commercial interests and that the political organisation had not demonstrated an overriding justification that would outweigh Ikea's rights. Vlaams Belang had defended the use on freedom-of-expression grounds.
What Happens Next
The Belgian court that originally raised the legal questions must now apply the ECJ's interpretation when issuing its own ruling. That decision could determine remedies or restrictions on the party's use of the name and associated visual elements under EU trademark law.
This ruling underlines that political uses of well-known brands can be restricted where they take advantage of a mark's reputation or risk damaging its repute, even when invoked in the context of political speech.
Help us improve.
