USA TODAY on July 22 asked a Colorado bankruptcy court to intervene in Shilo Sanders’ case and unseal documents, including a redacted transcript of a July 14 sealed hearing. Sanders filed for bankruptcy in 2023 seeking to discharge an $11.89 million default judgment tied to a 2015 school incident. The paper argues the public’s First Amendment right to access court proceedings weighs against secrecy, particularly given the family’s public profile and the case’s procedural history.
USA TODAY Moves To Unseal Records, Intervene in Shilo Sanders Bankruptcy Case

USA TODAY has filed a motion to intervene in the Colorado bankruptcy proceeding of former Colorado football player Shilo Sanders, asking the court to unseal records and release a redacted transcript of a July 14 pretrial hearing that was conducted under seal.
What USA TODAY Asked The Court
The national news organization filed the motion in Colorado bankruptcy court on July 22 through Denver law firm Zansberg Beylkin LLC. The filing asks the court to: (1) order the release of a redacted transcript of the July 14 hearing; (2) unseal several motions that were adjudicated at that hearing and had been filed under seal in May; and (3) oppose any effort to close the upcoming bankruptcy trial scheduled for Aug. 31.
Legal Basis: Public Access And The First Amendment
USA TODAY argues that the public and press have a presumptive First Amendment right to attend and report on judicial proceedings, and that courts should only restrict access when specific legal findings justify closure. The filing emphasizes the press’s role as a surrogate for the public in ensuring transparency and accountability in the judicial system.
Case Background
Shilo Sanders, 26 and the son of Colorado head coach Deion Sanders, filed for bankruptcy in 2023 seeking to discharge an $11.89 million default judgment tied to an incident at a Dallas school in 2015, when he was 15. John Darjean, a former school security guard, sued Sanders and his parents in 2016 alleging an assault that caused permanent injuries. Sanders’ parents were dismissed from the suit by early 2019.
The case proceeded to a Texas trial in 2022, but Shilo Sanders did not appear. After hearing Darjean’s evidence, a judge entered an $11.89 million default judgment against him. Darjean is now contesting Sanders’ bankruptcy filing and argues the judgment is nondischargeable because it arises from a "willful and malicious injury." Sanders contends the episode was self-defense and seeks to discharge the debt through bankruptcy.
Why The Matter Attracts Public Interest
USA TODAY notes several factors that make public access important: Deion Sanders’ public statements calling Darjean a "grifter" and disputing the claims; the family’s public profile and the potential perception that wealthy or famous parties could receive special treatment; and the general principle that bankruptcy proceedings are ordinarily public as part of the tradeoff that allows debtors to obtain a fresh start.
Procedural Questions Raised
The filing highlights procedural choices that shaped the litigation: Deion Sanders was an original defendant in the 2016 lawsuit but was dismissed by early 2019. The motion asks why Shilo Sanders allowed his attorneys to withdraw in 2020 when he was 20 — a decision his former counsel said was because he was "unwilling or unable to continue funding the defense" — and notes that Sanders did not retain new counsel until after Darjean sought collection on the judgment in 2023.
Next Steps: The bankruptcy court will consider USA TODAY’s motion to intervene and whether to unseal the requested materials. The central legal question remains whether the $11.89 million judgment can be discharged or is excepted from discharge under bankruptcy law.
Reporter: Brent Schrotenboer (@Schrotenboer). Email: [email protected]
Help us improve.




























