House Republicans are pressing to amend the 1993 NVRA to give states clearer authority to remove ineligible voters and to broaden use of federal databases such as DHS’s SAVE to verify citizenship. Supporters say the changes would help keep voter rolls accurate; critics — including Democrats, privacy advocates and the ACLU — warn of privacy risks and wrongful purges. The NVRA already contains protections, like a 90-day quiet period before federal elections, and major legislative changes would likely face a Senate filibuster.
House Republicans Push To Let States Purge More Ineligible Voters; SAVE Database Proposal Draws Fire

Republican members of the U.S. House are pushing to rewrite parts of the 1993 National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) to give states clearer authority to remove ineligible voters from registration lists — including noncitizens, people who have moved, and the deceased. A House Administration subcommittee hearing this week made clear that some congressional Republicans support a larger federal role in a process historically handled at the state level.
What Was at Issue
At the Subcommittee on Elections hearing, lawmakers debated proposals to clarify the NVRA's maintenance provisions. The NVRA requires state motor vehicle agencies to offer voter registration and mandates a general program of maintenance, but conservatives argue the statute's vague language makes routine list upkeep difficult.
Witnesses outlined two paths to expand removals: (1) amend the NVRA to explicitly require states to identify registrants who are 'ineligible on any basis' and (2) require or encourage state access to federal databases — notably the Department of Homeland Security's SAVE (Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements) system — to verify citizenship and immigration status.
Federal Pressure And Legal Actions
Since the Trump administration began, the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security have increased efforts to collect voter data and to press state officials to conduct more aggressive list maintenance. The Justice Department has filed suits seeking lists of registered voters from more than a dozen mostly Democratic states, and several Republican-led states previously sued the federal government over access to tools for identifying ineligible voters; those disputes were later resolved through settlement.
Privacy And Accuracy Concerns
Democrats, civil liberties groups and some state election officials warned that using SAVE or other federal databases risks exposing sensitive personal data. Unredacted voter rolls can contain driver’s license numbers and partial Social Security numbers; linking those records to SAVE or Social Security data heightens privacy and data-sharing concerns.
Sophia Lin Lakin, ACLU: Overly broad purges risk wrongly removing eligible voters and undermining public confidence in elections.
Legal Safeguards Highlighted
Testimony also stressed existing protections in federal law. The NVRA includes a 90-day 'quiet period' before federal elections that prevents systematic removals during that interval, giving voters time to correct erroneous deletions and ensuring last-minute purges do not prevent people from voting.
Voices At The Hearing
Subcommittee Chair Rep. Laurel Lee (R-Fla.) urged clearer statutory language so election officials can maintain accurate rolls. Law professor Michael Morley of Florida State University recommended amending the NVRA to let states identify registrants who were never eligible, and suggested Congress consider mandating state access to SAVE or similar databases. Ranking member Rep. Terri Sewell (D-Ala.) and other Democrats warned that expanded federal intervention and rushed purges could erect new barriers to voting and amplify misinformation-driven policy changes at the state level.
Political Outlook
Although House Republicans and the White House may back changes, a broad revision to federal voting law would likely face a Democratic filibuster in the Senate, making sweeping reform before the 2026 midterms unlikely. Still, the hearing signals continuing momentum among some Republicans for federal tools and standards to bolster state-level voter-roll maintenance.
Why It Matters
Changes to the NVRA or adoption of SAVE for voter verification could reshape how states manage registrations — balancing improved accuracy against risks to privacy, administrative burden, and the potential for wrongful removals. Policymakers must weigh data integrity and civil liberties while ensuring access to the ballot.
Reporting note: Stateline's Jonathan Shorman contributed to the original reporting.
Similar Articles

Four Republican States Agree to Let DHS Access Driver’s License Records for Expanded Citizenship Verification
The Trump administration and four Republican-led states — Florida, Indiana, Iowa and Ohio — reached a settlement in which the...

DHS Seeks to Link State Driver’s License Records to SAVE, Raising Privacy and Voting-Integrity Concerns
DHS has proposed linking the Nlets law-enforcement network to its SAVE citizenship-verification system to bring state driver’...

States Can Remove Voting Barriers For Native American Communities Ahead Of Midterms
Native American voters continue to face structural and administrative barriers — from lack of street addresses and reliance o...

DOJ Expands Lawsuits: Six More States Sued for Refusing Voter Registration Data
The Justice Department sued six more states — Delaware, Maryland, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington — for refu...

Ten Democratic Secretaries of State Demand Answers Over DOJ Requests for Voter Files
The ten Democratic secretaries of state have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem for...

State Department: About 85,000 U.S. Visas Revoked Since January Amid Expanded Vetting
The State Department says roughly 85,000 visas have been revoked since January, including more than 8,000 student visas — mor...

Hardline Push for Sweeping Vetting and Deportations Intensifies After National Guard Shooting
Immigration hardliners are pressing the Trump administration for sweeping vetting and deportation measures after a recent Nat...

Florida Could Be Decisive In GOP’s Mid‑Decade Redistricting Push
Florida has launched a formal mid‑decade redistricting process that could deliver several additional U.S. House seats to Repu...

From 'Stop the Steal' to the Halls of Power: Election Deniers Reshape U.S. Election Oversight
The Trump administration has placed several prominent election deniers into powerful federal roles and pursued broad voter‑da...

Redistricting Rush Ahead Of 2026: GOP Push, Democratic Counters And Court Battles
Republicans, led by President Donald Trump, have launched an unprecedented mid‑decade push to redraw congressional maps to pr...

White House Redistricting Push Faces Critical Test in Indiana as GOP Senators Push Back
President Donald Trump directed GOP state legislatures to pursue mid-decade redistricting in 2025 to lock in more House seats...

How Democrats Can Reclaim Congress: A Practical, Voter-Focused Agenda
Democrats can reclaim congressional majorities by uniting behind practical, voter-focused policies. With public approval of P...

House Shake-Up: Dozens Of Retirements And Campaign Moves Reshape The 2026 Midterm Battlefield
The 2026 midterm picture is being reshaped by dozens of House departures — retirements, gubernatorial and Senate bids, and ea...

Mid‑Decade Redistricting Surge: GOP and Democrats Clash Over Maps That Could Decide the 2026 House
Republicans, backed by President Trump, are pursuing an unprecedented mid‑decade redistricting campaign to shore up a slim Ho...

Heavily Redacted Voter Records of Ex‑Des Moines Superintendent Trigger Federal Lawsuit Threat
The release of heavily redacted voter registration records for Ian Andre Roberts — a former Des Moines schools superintendent...
