CRBC News
Politics
Conflict
Security
Economy
Science
Technology
Environment
Health
Culture
Society
Lifestyle
Politics

Supreme Court Restores Texas Map, Boosting GOP 2026 Prospects — Court Also Takes Up Birthright Citizenship

09:20 AM, 12/06/2025
Supreme Court Restores Texas Map, Boosting GOP 2026 Prospects — Court Also Takes Up Birthright Citizenship

The Supreme Court temporarily reinstated Texas’ congressional map, allowing the Republican-favored districts to stand for the 2026 midterms after a lower court had found the map to be an illegal racial gerrymander. The majority said the district court overreached by intervening in an active primary, while Justice Elena Kagan and other Democratic appointees dissented, defending the lower court’s factual findings. The Court is also considering major cases on executive removal power, campaign finance, capital punishment and troop deployment, and it added a landmark challenge to birthright citizenship to its docket.

Supreme Court Temporarily Reinstates Texas Map

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday temporarily reinstated Texas’ congressional map, a move that clears the way for the Republican-leaning plan to be used in the 2026 midterm elections. A three-judge lower court panel led by Trump-appointed U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown had ruled the map an illegal racial gerrymander, prompting Texas to seek emergency relief from the high court.

Majority Says Lower Court Overreached

The GOP-appointed majority agreed to put the map back in place, saying the district court improperly intervened in an active primary contest and upset the federal-state balance in election administration. Unlike many other shadow-docket rulings, the majority provided a succinct rationale, emphasizing concerns about district courts inserting themselves into ongoing electoral processes.

Dissent From Democratic Appointees

Justice Elena Kagan—writing for the three Democratic appointees—argued the majority "disrespects the work of a District Court that did everything one could ask to carry out its charge" and "disserves the millions of Texans whom the District Court found were assigned to their new districts based on their race."

The dissent warned that the majority’s decision effectively undercuts detailed factual findings by the district court and could leave minority voters without the protections the lower court sought to provide.

Broader Implications and Pending Cases

The ruling is likely to have immediate political consequences for the 2026 midterms by preserving a map favorable to Republicans. The Court is also weighing a slate of consequential cases that could reshape federal power and criminal law, including arguments next week about executive removal authority, campaign finance limits, and expanded applications of capital punishment. The justices could rule at any time on whether the administration may deploy federal troops to assist law enforcement in Chicago.

Birthright Citizenship Added To Docket

In a separate development, the Court agreed to review a high-profile immigration question: whether the longstanding constitutional understanding that people born in the United States automatically acquire citizenship regardless of parents’ immigration status should be revisited. The decision to take the case raises the prospect of a significant change to long-settled precedent, though analysts remain divided on how far the Court will go.

As with many major Supreme Court decisions, the full legal and political consequences won’t be clear until the justices issue reasoned opinions. For now, the emergency order in Texas shifts the short-term electoral landscape and signals the Court’s continued central role in disputes with national ramifications.

If you have questions or comments about this coverage, please submit them through the provided form for a chance to be featured in further analysis and newsletters.

Similar Articles

Trending