The First Circuit Court of Appeals ruled for four Bow, New Hampshire, parents who wore pink "XX" wristbands at a girls' soccer match to protest transgender athletes, finding their silent display was protected by the First Amendment. School officials had accused them of harassment, stopped the game, and had police escort them away; two parents also received no‑trespass orders. The appeals court reversed a lower court ruling and remanded the case for further proceedings, concluding the wristbands did not constitute harassment or disruption.
First Circuit: Pink "XX" Wristbands Are Protected Speech in Parents' Protest
Illustration: Matimix/Dreamstime/Midjourney
Four parents from Bow, New Hampshire, who wore pink "XX" wristbands to a girls' soccer match to protest the participation of transgender athletes have won a key ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. School officials accused the parents of harassing, intimidating, and threatening a player on the opposing team; two parents were also issued no‑trespass orders. When the parents refused requests to remove the wristbands, school staff halted the game and had police escort the individuals from school property.
Background
The parents sued the school district, contending their wristbands were a silent, peaceful expression protected by the First Amendment. A federal district court initially sided with the school, agreeing that the display could be treated as harassment or a disruptive act.
Appeals Court Ruling
The First Circuit reversed that decision and remanded the case to the district court. The appeals panel concluded that the quiet wearing of pink "XX" wristbands did not rise to the level of harassment or disruption and that the school had improperly punished the parents based on the viewpoint they expressed. The court's ruling focuses on the constitutional protection for nonverbal, political expression in a public‑forum-like setting.
What Happens Next
With the case sent back to the lower court, further proceedings will determine the remedies and whether the parents are entitled to relief for the alleged First Amendment violations. The ruling could shape how schools handle peaceful, symbolic protests at youth sporting events and other school‑connected activities.
Key facts: Four parents; Bow, New Hampshire; pink "XX" wristbands as a silent protest; game halted and police involved; two no‑trespass orders; First Circuit reversed and remanded, finding protected expression.
Help us improve.
