After U.S. forces captured Nicolás Maduro, President Trump openly described the intervention as driven largely by U.S. energy interests and a desire to reassert American influence in the hemisphere. He said major U.S. oil companies would be invited to rebuild Venezuela’s energy infrastructure and warned that U.S. troops could enforce those aims if needed. Trump declined to back opposition leaders and offered no clear electoral timeline; many practical and geopolitical uncertainties — including the role of Cuban personnel and reactions from Russia and China — remain.
Trump’s Venezuela Operation: An Overt Oil Agenda and Its Global Risks

Following a complex U.S. military and intelligence operation that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, President Donald Trump spoke clearly about the motives behind the intervention — and they were strikingly economic and geopolitical.
What Trump Announced
At a lengthy press conference, Trump said the United States would "run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition." He explicitly said large U.S. oil companies would be invited to invest billions to repair Venezuela's energy infrastructure and recover assets that were nationalized decades ago. "We're going to have our very large United States oil companies... go in," he said, adding that the revenue would both benefit Venezuelans and reimburse American firms.
Trump also left no doubt that military force remains an option. "They always say 'boots on the ground' — we're not afraid of boots on the ground," he said, noting U.S. personnel had been involved in the Maduro operation and that forces were ready to act again if necessary.
Context And Credibility
The history of U.S. intervention across Central and South America — from covert CIA actions to overt military and political interference that sometimes advantaged U.S. corporations — is long and well documented. What distinguishes Trump’s statements is their bluntness: earlier presidencies often framed interventions as fights against Communism or defenses of democracy; Trump framed this operation in terms of energy assets and geopolitical dominance, language echoed in his administration’s National Security Strategy as a "Trump corollary" to the Monroe Doctrine.
Legal and political signals were mixed. Maduro and his wife were arrested and later indicted in New York on drug-trafficking charges, but Trump’s remarks suggested those charges were not the sole rationale for the operation. The president also recently pardoned former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández — convicted on drug charges — a move critics cite as evidence of selective enforcement.
Who Will Lead Venezuela?
When asked about potential Venezuelan leaders, Trump declined to endorse opposition figure María Corina Machado and made no reference to Edmundo González, elected in 2024 and reportedly exiled after disputed post-election events. Instead, Trump indicated Washington would "designate various people" to oversee a transition, pointing to U.S. officials who stood behind him at the briefing.
Under Venezuelan law the vice president — now Delcy Rodríguez, who was sworn in as acting president — must call new elections. Trump claimed Secretary of State Marco Rubio was "working with" Rodríguez and that she was "willing to do what’s necessary to make Venezuela great again," but concrete timelines or guarantees for free and fair elections were not provided.
Practical Obstacles
Venezuela's population is roughly 28.5 million, and much of the country's state apparatus remains intact: military officers, cabinet ministers, and bureaucrats are largely still in place. More than 20,000 Cubans — including military, intelligence and medical personnel — operate in Venezuela, often in exchange for oil. How these forces will respond, whether they will leave, and how power struggles will play out are major unknowns.
Global Implications
Beyond tactical military success, Trump’s openly imperial rationale could reshape global dynamics. Observers warn it may encourage Russia and China to press harder in Ukraine and Taiwan respectively, and could influence unrest in other authoritarian states. The U.S. carrier strike group off Venezuela remained on high alert, and Trump said the administration was prepared to "stage a second and much larger attack if we need to do so."
Bottom Line
Trump framed the operation in starkly economic and geopolitical terms: reclaim energy assets, reassert U.S. influence in the Western Hemisphere, and use military force if necessary. Significant legal, political, and human-security questions remain about how a transition would be managed and the broader international fallout.
Help us improve.































