The article examines recent political moves that may threaten the CPSC's independence after three commissioners were removed in May 2025 and the Supreme Court upheld those removals in July 2025. As of July 21, 2026, only Acting Chairman Peter A. Feldman remains on the commission, and two Republican nominees — Karen Sessions and Brien Lorenze — have been put forward. Thirty consumer groups led by the National Consumers League objected, citing the agency's bipartisan role and its record of reducing injuries and deaths across multiple product categories. Advocates warn that partisan stacking and conflicts of interest could undermine consumer safety oversight.
Is the Consumer Product Safety Commission Becoming Politicized? What the Recent Firings and Nominations Mean for Consumer Safety
US CPSC Update
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) was created in 1972 to protect the public from hazardous consumer products. Its independence and bipartisan structure were intended to shield safety decisions from partisan politics, large donors, and presidential pressure. Recent events, however, have raised serious questions about whether that independence is eroding.
What happened: In May 2025, three sitting CPSC commissioners were removed from office. Under the Consumer Product Safety Act, commissioners may be removed by the President only for neglect of duty or malfeasance. The three dismissed commissioners were not accused of either, and no charges were filed at the time of their ouster. They sued, and a U.S. District Court ordered their reinstatement in June 2025. In July 2025, however, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an emergency ruling siding with the administration, allowing the removals to stand.
A near-empty commission: As of July 21, 2026, only one commissioner, Peter A. Feldman, is serving at the CPSC and is acting chairman. All commissioners serve seven-year terms; Feldman’s term is scheduled to expire in October 2026. According to analysis from law firm Arnold & Porter, the Consumer Product Safety Act requires at least three commissioners to form a quorum and conduct official business — a threshold the agency currently does not meet.
New nominations and concerns: President Trump nominated two candidates to fill CPSC seats: Karen Sessions (February 2026) and Brien Lorenze, the agency’s executive director (June 2026). Both nominees are Republicans; if confirmed, these appointments would eliminate the commission’s recent bipartisan balance. On July 21, 2026, 30 consumer advocacy organizations led by the National Consumers League sent a joint letter urging the White House and Senate to reject the nominations. The groups warned that stacking the commission with members of one party could reduce transparency, limit oversight, and chill expert dissent.
"Historically, the agency's independence has buffered commissioners from political pressure... Diverse perspectives and transparency improve safety," the coalition wrote, urging that minority viewpoints and subject-matter expertise be preserved.
The letter also flagged potential conflicts of interest involving product lines tied to the President, his family, or prominent supporters — a concern given the CPSC's role in regulating consumer products that affect public health and safety.
CPSC's Record Of Public-Health Impact
The advocacy letter emphasizes measurable safety gains tied to CPSC standards and enforcement: residential fires fell 43% between 1980 and 2018, fire deaths declined 47%, and fire injuries dropped 41% in the same period. Child poisonings decreased roughly 80% from 1972 to 2020. Bicycle injuries, crib-related deaths, and pool-equipment injury rates all saw substantial declines across multi-decade spans.
Why this matters: Consumer protection often requires an agency willing to push back on manufacturers and powerful interests. A multi-member, bipartisan commission helps ensure debate, expertise, and oversight — safeguards that advocates warn could be weakened by partisan stacking or conflicts of interest. In an economy built to reduce friction, regulatory friction is sometimes necessary to prevent harm and preserve public safety.
Looking ahead: The Senate will consider the nominations, and public pressure from consumer groups may influence the process. The ultimate outcome will shape whether the CPSC can continue operating with the bipartisan oversight and independence it was designed to provide — or whether it will become more subject to partisan control.
Help us improve.
