A group calling itself "Georgians for Integrity" has spent about $5 million on TV ads, mailers and texts attacking Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, accusing him of using his office for personal gain. The group was incorporated in Delaware on Nov. 24 as a nonprofit social welfare entity, a structure that can shield donor identities. Jones denies the claims and has threatened legal action while the Georgia GOP filed an ethics complaint seeking donor disclosure. Legal experts say the surge in anonymous spending reflects broader post-Citizens United trends affecting state races.
Anonymous Group Spends $5 Million on Ads Targeting Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones — Who's Behind It?

ATLANTA — A shadowy organization calling itself "Georgians for Integrity" has poured roughly $5 million into television commercials, mailers and text messages attacking Republican Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, fueling one of the most contentious and least transparent disputes in Georgia politics.
The barrage of ads, which became pervasive on local television after Thanksgiving, accuses Jones — who has President Donald Trump’s endorsement in his bid for governor — of using his public office to benefit his family’s commercial interests. Jones and his campaign strongly deny the allegations and have threatened legal action against broadcasters that continue to run the spots.
Who Is Behind The Spending?
Georgians for Integrity was incorporated in Delaware on Nov. 24 and is listed as a nonprofit social welfare organization under federal tax rules — a structure commonly used to permit political spending while shielding donor identities. The group provided a mailbox at an Atlanta office-supply store as a local contact and listed a Park City, Utah-based media buyer and an Ohio attorney on some filings, but investigative attempts to identify the source of the money have so far come up empty.
Allegations And The Facts
The ads claim Jones enabled government action — including eminent domain — to benefit a massive data-center project tied to his family’s interests in his home county south of Atlanta. Jones did vote in 2017 for a narrow change to state law that permits limited exceptions related to property transfer after condemnation. But state government filings show no evidence that eminent domain has been used to benefit the development, which filings describe as a possible $10 billion project that could include roughly 11 million square feet of data centers.
Jones called the ads "fabricated trash" in a Dec. 16 interview with WSB-AM and accused the anonymous backers of spreading lies about him and his family. His top Republican rivals — Attorney General Chris Carr and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger — have denied involvement in the ad campaign.
Legal And Political Fallout
The Georgia Republican Party filed a complaint with the State Ethics Commission, asserting that the ads violate state campaign finance law by spending to influence an election without registering and disclosing donors. Under Georgia law, independent committees may raise and spend unlimited funds but must register and disclose donors if they expend money "for the purpose of affecting the outcome of an election." Georgians for Integrity’s ads stop short of explicitly naming the 2026 gubernatorial race but urge viewers to call Jones and "Tell Burt, stop profiting off taxpayers."
State GOP Chair Josh McKoon called the lack of disclosure a "semantic game" and warned of broader consequences if anonymous political spending goes unchecked. Legal experts point to the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision as a turning point that expanded the role of independent, often anonymous, political spending across national and state contests.
What It Means
The episode underscores how so-called dark money groups can shape early and high-dollar messaging in state-level primaries, complicating accountability and raising questions about whether existing disclosure laws are sufficient to inform voters. The identity of the donors behind Georgians for Integrity remains unknown, and whether the ethics complaint or potential legal action will force disclosure or remove the ads remains to be seen.
Bottom line: $5 million in anonymous spending has injected a fierce, uncertain element into Georgia’s Republican primary — spotlighting the growing influence of undisclosed money in state elections.


































