Unitarity in quantum mechanics implies information is conserved, yet black holes — through Hawking radiation and evaporation — seemed to threaten that principle. Recent theoretical progress treats spacetime quantum mechanically and uncovers rare geometric contributions (including wormhole-like connections and islands) that allow information to be encoded in outgoing radiation. Revised entropy calculations that include these effects restore consistency with information conservation, though important technical questions remain about how this applies to realistic black holes and a full theory of quantum gravity.
Do Black Holes Really Destroy Information? What Physics Now Says
Unitarity in quantum mechanics implies information is conserved, yet black holes — through Hawking radiation and evaporation — seemed to threaten that principle. Recent theoretical progress treats spacetime quantum mechanically and uncovers rare geometric contributions (including wormhole-like connections and islands) that allow information to be encoded in outgoing radiation. Revised entropy calculations that include these effects restore consistency with information conservation, though important technical questions remain about how this applies to realistic black holes and a full theory of quantum gravity.

Does information ever truly disappear?
Around 38 percent of websites that existed in 2013 have vanished, and roughly half of Wikipedia articles point to dead links. Records decay, archives rot and data are lost on geological timescales. Yet at the most fundamental level, modern physics suggests a strikingly different idea: information may not be erased.
Unitarity: the idea that information is conserved
Quantum mechanics enshrines the principle of unitarity, which implies the evolution of an isolated system is reversible. In principle, perfect knowledge of the present state of the universe would allow you to reconstruct its past and predict its future. From that point of view, destroying information would be a violation of the basic rules of physics.
Where the paradox appears: black holes and Hawking radiation
Black holes appear to challenge unitarity. Stephen Hawking showed in 1974 that black holes emit a faint flux of particles—now called Hawking radiation—and over immensely long times a black hole can evaporate completely. If nothing remains to record what fell in, how can the information about the black hole’s contents survive?
“It looks like the information is destroyed, unless it gets out,” — Thomas Hartman, Cornell University.
Ordinary decay processes leave traces—ash, heat, chemical changes—from which an enterprising scientist could reconstruct what happened. Black holes are different because their event horizon prevents anything from escaping. The Hawking particles are produced just outside the horizon, which led many to conclude that they could not carry information about the black hole’s hidden interior. When Hawking calculated the entropy of an evaporated black hole, the result suggested residual entropy remained—an apparent loss of information.
New perspective: quantum spacetime, islands and wormholes
Progress came when researchers began treating spacetime itself as a quantum object rather than a fixed background. In quantum gravity approaches, geometry can exist as a superposition of different shapes. While most contributions resemble the classical black hole, rare configurations can look very different; in some calculations the interiors of black holes are connected via subtle wormhole-like bridges.
These contributions give rise to the so-called island prescription. In certain entropy computations an island—a region that classically sits inside the black hole—effectively behaves as if it lies outside for the purpose of bookkeeping information. Accounting for these effects changes the entropy calculation: the previously troubling residual entropy disappears, and the final state is consistent with zero entropy as required by unitarity.
In practical terms this means information is not destroyed but becomes encoded in an exceptionally subtle, highly scrambled way in the outgoing radiation. Recovering it would require an extraordinarily delicate and complex measurement—analogous to reconstructing a burned message from ashes—making retrieval effectively impossible in realistic situations even if it is possible in principle.
What remains unresolved
These advances greatly reduce the tension in the black hole information paradox, but they do not constitute a finished solution. Key technical and conceptual questions remain—particularly about how these ideas extend from controlled toy models to realistic astrophysical black holes, and what they imply for a full theory of quantum gravity.
Black holes are valuable theoretical laboratories because they highlight the clash between Einstein’s general relativity (which governs gravity) and quantum mechanics (which governs the very small). Understanding how information is stored and retrieved in black holes may point the way toward a unified quantum theory of gravity and illuminate the deep relationship between spacetime and quantum information.
Broader implications
One provocative outcome of this work is the idea that spacetime itself may be fundamentally built from discrete units of information, with entanglement between those units helping to shape geometry. If so, the universe may retain a record of events even when macroscopic objects decay—though that record may be encoded in ways that are effectively inaccessible.
For now, the best reading of current theory is comforting: information, at least in principle, survives. In a world of ephemeral things—websites, lives, planets—physics suggests a deep-level persistence of records, however scrambled they may become.
Sources and further reading: foundational work on Hawking radiation; recent reviews on the island rule, quantum extremal surfaces, and the role of replica wormholes in black hole entropy calculations.
