The Easton Planning Commission heard final testimony from residents and expert witnesses opposing a proposed 1 million-square-foot warehouse at 1525 Wood Ave. Experts challenged the developer's modeling, raised concerns about changes to topography and sightlines, and questioned traffic, security and nighttime-noise impacts (projected 47–52 dBA). The developer's attorney disputed witness qualifications and the evidentiary basis of their renderings. The commission will vote on Dec. 3 at 6:30 p.m. at Easton City Hall.
Easton Residents Deliver Final Objections Ahead of Dec. 3 Vote on 1M‑Sq‑Ft Wood Ave. Warehouse
The Easton Planning Commission heard final testimony from residents and expert witnesses opposing a proposed 1 million-square-foot warehouse at 1525 Wood Ave. Experts challenged the developer's modeling, raised concerns about changes to topography and sightlines, and questioned traffic, security and nighttime-noise impacts (projected 47–52 dBA). The developer's attorney disputed witness qualifications and the evidentiary basis of their renderings. The commission will vote on Dec. 3 at 6:30 p.m. at Easton City Hall.

Opponents make their closing case as planners prepare to decide
After more than a year of review, the Easton Planning Commission will consider a final decision on Dec. 3 for a proposed 1 million-square-foot warehouse at 1525 Wood Ave. On Wednesday evening, a packed Easton City Hall heard the last of the opposition testimony as a coalition of residents and expert witnesses presented concerns about environmental impacts, traffic and noise.
Experts challenge developer materials and modeling
The opposition had previously submitted a large binder of evidence. Scannell Properties, the developer, responded with expert witnesses at two late-night hearings. At Wednesday's session, attorney Cody Harding called several additional experts to rebut the developer's materials and analyses. Solicitor Joel Sheer reminded witnesses to keep testimony focused on issues raised by the developer's experts at prior meetings.
Daniel Brown, a 3D-modeling specialist, presented visual simulations built from official topographical data, engineering drawings and Google Earth imagery. Brown said the renderings show how the warehouse would substantially alter site contours and neighborhood sightlines, require extensive retaining walls and change views toward the Silk Mill and Bushkill Creek. He contrasted those simulations with the applicant's promotional images, arguing that industry-standard modeling better verifies scale and elevation.
"The renderings demonstrate a meaningful change in scale and sightlines for nearby residents," Brown testified.
Developer counsel Mark Kaplan objected repeatedly to Brown's exhibits, questioning their evidentiary value and asking whether licensed engineers had authenticated the underlying drawings. Kaplan argued the commission should rely on certified plans officially filed by the applicant.
Traffic, security and noise concerns
Traffic engineer Peter Terry of Benchmark Civil Engineering Services reviewed the project's traffic and acoustic assessments. Terry said the applicant relied too much on off-peak traffic data and did not adequately account for on-site vehicle movements that can raise noise and activity. He also noted that large distribution facilities commonly include guard houses for security — an element absent from the submitted site plan — and that a guard house could materially affect internal circulation and congestion patterns.
"From my experience with facilities of this size, guard houses are typical. They change traffic flow and where vehicles queue," Terry said.
Bailey Hilgren, a Ph.D. candidate at New York University studying environmental noise and health, criticized the applicant's noise modeling for simplifying terrain effects and overlooking operational noise sources such as truck alarms and loading-dock activity. She highlighted that the applicant's projected nighttime sound range of 47 to 52 dBA sits at the legal limit, leaving little or no margin for error if actual conditions are worse. Hilgren also pointed out the noise study excluded construction noise and did not examine how surface materials might change sound propagation.
Kaplan challenged Hilgren's qualifications, arguing academic study does not substitute for professional licensure or direct experience conducting acoustical studies.
Former tractor-trailer driver Jeremy Gold provided practical context about how trucks move through distribution centers, including queuing, security checks and drop-off procedures. He explained Pennsylvania's idling rules and noted exceptions for loading and unloading that can increase onsite engine idling and associated noise.
What comes next
All testimony is complete. The Easton Planning Commission is scheduled to decide on the proposed warehouse at its Dec. 3 meeting at 6:30 p.m. in Easton City Hall. Commission Chair Ken Greene thanked residents for their sustained participation, calling the process thorough.
Key facts:
- Project: 1 million-square-foot warehouse at 1525 Wood Ave.
- Developer: Scannell Properties
- Next step: Easton Planning Commission decision on Dec. 3, 6:30 p.m., Easton City Hall
Read the original reporting on lehighvalleylive.com.
